Re: [DNSOP] Subject: request for adoption: draft-edns-presentation

Hi Libor, Tom, Thanks for this, I believe this will be a good extension to the EDNS specification to help operators hunt down issues. I support its adoption by the WG. Should the WG disagree, please submit it as an individual submission. On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 20:25 +0100, libor.peltan wrote: >

[DNSOP] FOSDEM 2023 DNS Devroom Call for Presentations

Hello DNS enthusiasts and other developers, After three earlier successful and packed DNS devrooms at FOSDEM 2018, 2019, and 2020, we are happy to announce a half-day DNS devroom at FOSDEM 2023. As with the previous events, we hope to host talks anywhere from hardcore protocol stuff, to

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

Hi Joe, On 5/10/21 1:42 AM, Joe Abley wrote: > On May 9, 2021, at 19:27, Paul Hoffman wrote: > >> If I'm wrong about this being as good as it can be, there must be an item >> delimiter that is better than a comma. I am not thinking creatively enough >> to figure out what might be better than

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

Hi Dick, On 5/10/21 1:02 PM, Dick Franks wrote: > My objection is narrowly focussed on the escape mechanism, nothing > more. Changing the delimiter is neither necessary nor relevant. > > I am happy to contribute the necessary words. If you have the words to fix this issue that would need to

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

Hi Dick, On 5/9/21 2:01 PM, Dick Franks wrote: > Pre-processing of '\\,' into the RFC1035 standard '\,' is > superficially attractive, but also fraught with danger. > > A parser could have some fun with this one: > > $ORIGIN example.com > @ SVCB 1 foo >

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

,bar' that is then parsed to a list of length 1 with value {'foo,bar'}. So nothing changes from the perspective of the rfc 1035 parser. I can see how this might be confusing to those writing zone contents and would support a solution that either prohibits comma's in SVCParam list values or a differen

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-04.txt

s appendix. I'll try to update the vectors this week, changing the format and adding some missed cases as well. Cheers, Pieter -- Pieter Lexis PowerDNS.COM BV -- https://www.powerdns.com ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-04.txt

S/pdns/pull/10074/files#diff-1c55ae7b2d1073637c05a035de9ef6688ecffb209e50b3bef8b3d9ea1c5a329dR308-R393 -- Pieter Lexis PowerDNS.COM BV -- https://www.powerdns.com ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-04.txt

is can still be added? +1000 The PowerDNS unit tests already has a bunch of tests that do the presentation -> wire -> presentation roundtrip. I could convert those to using example.com, use some more hex and send a PR to the authors should they want this. Cheers, Pieter -- Pieter Lex

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https

hint to the end-client that it MUST understand the keys mentioned in order to use the RR? If that is the case, a few words to that effect would be good. I hope the rambling above makes the question clear. Cheers, Pieter -- Pieter Lexis PowerDNS.COM BV -- https://www.powerdns.com _

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-04.txt

Hi, On 3/18/21 6:42 PM, Tommy Pauly wrote: > Personally, I’d prefer to see the name change, and not burn a codepoint, > as long as we’re not breaking any zone files. Agree. > I think the question is: does anyone have a zone that has actually > deployed the echconfig parameter? I see many

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang

Hi folks, On 10/15/20 12:05 AM, Benno Overeinder wrote: > Current versions of the draft are available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang/ > > The Current Intended Status of this document is: Standards Track > > Benno Overeinder will be Document

Re: [DNSOP] Alias mode processing in auths for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-01

On 8/5/20 11:13 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: >> On 6 Aug 2020, at 04:51, Pieter Lexis wrote: >> On 8/5/20 8:03 PM, Brian Dickson wrote: >>> (I am not sure of the question/issue of including the SOA, or where that >>> would go, but I'll defer to anyone who knows or has a

Re: [DNSOP] Alias mode processing in auths for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-01

On 8/5/20 8:03 PM, Brian Dickson wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 10:08 AM Ben Schwartz > <mailto:40google@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 12:06 PM Pieter Lexis > mailto:pieter.le...@powerdns.com>> wrote: > ... > &g

[DNSOP] Alias mode processing in auths for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-01

s the case with an in-zone CNAME) considered an answer and should they go into the ANSWER section? I find the alias mode semantics (on the DNS-level) unclear and under-specified in the draft. I look forward to guidance from the authors. Best regards, Pieter -- Pieter Lexis PowerDNS.COM B

[DNSOP] FOSDEM 2020 DNS Developer Room Call for Participation

, The FOSDEM 2020 DNS Devroom organizers P.S. Apologies to those receiving multiple copies of these emails. -- Pieter Lexis PowerDNS.COM BV -- https://www.powerdns.com ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoptions: draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang

ETCONF ecosystem can benefit from this document being published. Best regards, Pieter -- Pieter Lexis PowerDNS.COM BV -- https://www.powerdns.com ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] A new version of mixfr

ikely) a NODATA in that case. Best regards, Pieter -- Pieter Lexis PowerDNS.COM BV -- https://www.powerdns.com ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption draft-hunt-dnsop-aname

ve. > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. As Peter is a direct colleague of mine, I will not supply a review, but am willing to provide text. Best regards, Pieter -- Pieter Lexis PowerDNS.COM BV -- https://www.powerdns.com ___

Re: [DNSOP] New draft for ALIAS/ANAME type

or a CNAME for a node that only has an ALIAS record should yield a response indicating that RRType does not exist at that node. Again, thank you for starting this draft. I support adoption of this draft in the dnsop WG to facilitate better interop between ALIAS/ANAME/CNAME-flattening implemento

Re: [DNSOP] draft-tale-dnsop-serve-stale

rds, Pieter -- Pieter Lexis PowerDNS.COM BV -- https://www.powerdns.com ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop