Hi Tim,
At 02:31 AM 07-07-2018, Tim Wicinski wrote:
There were initial concerns that the IPR was unclear, and never
fully settled.
All the guidance I received was that the issue would be addressed
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2909/
Yes, it is old, but it was the only reference I could dig up.
Thank you for the URL. The Tracker does not list the IPR disclosure
for the WG draft. I suggest looking at Section 3.3 of RFC 6702 [1].
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. It is Informational
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
