Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

On 3/16/17, 15:59, "Ralph Droms" wrote: >Ed - I think your document is ... With Homenet's session ending early, I removed the "definition" section (and retitled it to reflect that it is a case for clarifying, not to be confused with containing an architectural

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

On 3/16/17, 20:59, "Ralph Droms" wrote: >Ed - I think your document is a valuable reference and worth publishing. The >first question to ask is whether you want to continue with the publication >process. If you do, I'm sure we can find some way to publish it. In the