Re: [DNSOP] [Int-area] Please review draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation

2022-08-16 Thread Kazunori Fujiwara
> From: Mukund Sivaraman > Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Int-area] Please review > draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation > Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:58:04 +0530 > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 01:07:34PM +0900, Kazunori Fujiwara wrote: >> Thanks very much for your review. >> >&

Re: [DNSOP] [Int-area] Please review draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation

2022-08-15 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 01:07:34PM +0900, Kazunori Fujiwara wrote: > Thanks very much for your review. > > > From: "to...@strayalpha.com" > > Some comments: > > > > The doc starts by grouping ICMP-based path MTU discovery (PMTUD) with > > in-band discovery (PLPMTUD), but asserts (in the > >

Re: [DNSOP] [Int-area] Please review draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation

2022-08-15 Thread Kazunori Fujiwara
Thanks very much for your review. > From: "to...@strayalpha.com" > Some comments: > > The doc starts by grouping ICMP-based path MTU discovery (PMTUD) with in-band > discovery (PLPMTUD), but asserts (in the > first paragraph) that the group term “path MTU discovery” isn’t deployed due > to

Re: [DNSOP] [Int-area] Please review draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation

2022-08-06 Thread to...@strayalpha.com
Some comments: The doc starts by grouping ICMP-based path MTU discovery (PMTUD) with in-band discovery (PLPMTUD), but asserts (in the first paragraph) that the group term “path MTU discovery” isn’t deployed due to security concerns. I have seen no such concerns about PLPMTUD - if you are aware