On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 05:58:13PM +0100,
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote
a message of 19 lines which said:
> [Sorry for the long list of working groups but the discussion already
> started in different places.]
> It was suggested to have a side meeting in Prague at IETF 104. I
> propose monday
i've removed "dns-priv...@ietf.org" from the CC headers, at the WG chair's
request. note, the main topic of this message is DNS privacy's implications.
On Thursday, 14 March 2019 17:50:44 UTC Vinicius Fortuna [vee-NEE-see.oos]
wrote:
> Paul, I'm trying to understand your scenario.
>
> If you ra
Paul, I'm trying to understand your scenario.
If you ran your own DoH server in your network (doing RDNS or whatnot), and
the DoH server is distributed to clients via DHCP + a protocol upgrade
mechanism, would that address the concerns you are listing?
Vinicius Fortuna
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:
Moin!
On 14 Mar 2019, at 10:53, Stephen Farrell wrote:
On 14/03/2019 14:41, Ralf Weber wrote:
the DoH protocol caused some application providers to experiment with
switching resolution per default away from OS and the local network
provider
I wasn't aware that some application provider was d
Hiya,
On 14/03/2019 14:41, Ralf Weber wrote:
> the DoH protocol caused some application providers to experiment with
> switching resolution per default away from OS and the local network provider
I wasn't aware that some application provider was doing this
as their default (assuming that's what
Perfect idea, very good use of the Wednesday slot.
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 13:57, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> > Il 11 marzo 2019 alle 18.02 Stephane Bortzmeyer ha
> scritto:
> >
> > It was suggested Reference necessary to have a
> > side meeting in Prague at IETF 104. I propose monday, 1400-1600
