On 5/10/19 03:12, Brian Dickson wrote:
Have any "closed system" implementations of non-standard apex-CNAME
hacks, committed publicly to neutral ANAME operations, presuming ANAME
as currently envisioned?
Oracle are happy to see progress on ANAME and intend to support it. I
personally have
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:32 AM zuop...@cnnic.cn wrote:
>
> configure several CNAME records to use multi-CDN service is also widely used
> in industry, though this is not allowed by DNS standards.
> shall we support this on protocal level? like defining new CNAMEx record
> which contains
Date: 2019-05-12 14:59
To: Brian Dickson; dnsop
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ANAME high-level benefit question
Also, I would argue that the ability to run ANAME at your own infrastructure
might drive less people to the “managed DNS” land or allow them to migrate
away without a significant loss of functional
Also, I would argue that the ability to run ANAME at your own infrastructure
might drive less people to the “managed DNS” land or allow them to migrate
away without a significant loss of functionality.
One way or another, ANAME-like behaviour became defacto industry standard
and we need to have a
On 11/05/2019 15:54, Dave Lawrence wrote:
I have a related question ... is allowing only targets on their own
infrastructure currently a limitation most such providers have?
I don't know about "most", but certainly some. See e.g. the attached
message posted here 2018/06/25.
Ray
---
Brian Dickson writes:
> Have any "closed system" implementations of non-standard apex-CNAME
> hacks, committed publicly to neutral ANAME operations, presuming
> ANAME as currently envisioned? I.e. If each such provider will
> ONLY support ANAME with targets on their own infrastructure, I don't
>
On 5/10/19 9:12 AM, Brian Dickson wrote:
> Have any "closed system" implementations of non-standard apex-CNAME
> hacks, committed publicly to neutral ANAME operations, presuming ANAME
> as currently envisioned?
The #41 thread is what you'd like, I guess? But so far there's only a
single
I know a lot of folks are spending a lot of time working on ANAME.
At the risk of offending those well-intentioned folks, the question I have
is a follows:
Have any "closed system" implementations of non-standard apex-CNAME hacks,
committed publicly to neutral ANAME operations, presuming ANAME
