Re: [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-10-10 Thread Dave Crocker
On 10/10/2018 2:09 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: One other comment, in Section 3.1: Why is the new text only placing a "SHOULD be registered" requirement, as opposed to MUST? It permits use-before-registration, which avoids registration as a barrier to adoption. There is essentially no real

[DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-10-10 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please