Dan,
See below
On 3/24/14, 9:54 PM, Dan York wrote:
Tim,
I support these changes as they seem to be logical modifications to the
charter, particularly given the closing of the DNSEXT wg. I personally
don't know that DNSSEC needs to be added to point #5, as I do see it as a
natural extension
On 3/24/14, 1:48 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 3/19/14, 12:42 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
5. Address possible minor changes or extensions to the DNS Protocol,
initially with a focus on the operational impacts of these changes. Act
as clearinghouse or providing advice to ADs and other WGs on EDNS0
On 3/25/14, 8:39 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
On 3/24/14, 1:48 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 3/19/14, 12:42 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
5. Address possible minor changes or extensions to the DNS Protocol,
initially with a focus on the operational impacts of these changes. Act
as clearinghouse or
Tim,
I support these changes as they seem to be logical modifications to the
charter, particularly given the closing of the DNSEXT wg. I personally
don't know that DNSSEC needs to be added to point #5, as I do see it as a
natural extension of DNS. However, I could see that for clarity for
From: Warren Kumari
Date: 2014-03-21 19:38
To: Tim Wicinski
CC: joel jaeggli; dnsop
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Changes to Charter
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Tim Wicinski tjw.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a conversation I've scheduled a few times and I did poor time
mangement. After
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Tim Wicinski tjw.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
This is a conversation I've scheduled a few times and I did poor time
mangement. After some discussion we're proposing adding two items to the
DNSOP charter:
---
5. Address possible minor changes or extensions
On 3/21/14, 7:38 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Tim Wicinski tjw.i...@gmail.com wrote:
6. Publish documents which address DNS-related issues, by identifying and
documenting the problem space around the issue. The group will then discuss
these issues and decide if
I am fine with these 2 items if DNS includes DNSSEC. Maybe replacing
DNS by DNS or DNSSEC clarify this.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Tim Wicinski tjw.i...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/21/14, 7:38 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Tim Wicinski tjw.i...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/21/14, 9:46 AM, Daniel Migault wrote:
I am fine with these 2 items if DNS includes DNSSEC. Maybe replacing
DNS by DNS or DNSSEC clarify this.
Currently #2 of the charter states:
2. Publish documents concerning DNSSEC operational procedures.
But I understand what you mean
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, Tim Wicinski wrote:
After some discussion we're proposing adding two items to the
DNSOP charter:
---
5. Address possible minor changes or extensions to the DNS Protocol,
initially with a focus on the operational impacts of these changes. Act as
clearinghouse or
Hello
This is a conversation I've scheduled a few times and I did poor time
mangement. After some discussion we're proposing adding two items to
the DNSOP charter:
---
5. Address possible minor changes or extensions to the DNS Protocol,
initially with a focus on the operational impacts
11 matches
Mail list logo
