Hello Duane & others,
thank you for your response. Comments inline below.
On Thu, 2023-06-29 at 23:58 +, Wessels, Duane wrote:
>
>
> >
> > ## 2.2
> >
> > The first paragraph correctly mentions "policy reasons". The second
> > paragraph
> > correctly says "they are not authoritative". I
Hi Peter,
Thank you for the detailed review. Responses from the authors are inline below.
> On Jun 26, 2023, at 7:47 AM, Peter van Dijk via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Peter van Dijk
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this
On Mon, 2023-06-26 at 07:47 -0700, Peter van Dijk via Datatracker wrote:
> ## 3.2
>
> A previous review
> (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/sJlbyhro-4bDhfGBnXhhD5Htcew/)
> suggested that the then-chosen tuple was not specific enough, and also said it
> was too prescriptive. I agree
Reviewer: Peter van Dijk
Review result: Almost Ready
I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
DNS Directorate seeks to review all DNS or DNS-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the