i do not foresee a time when any dns protocol agent won't need NS
support any more, nor also UDP/53 support. so DELEG can at best add
features for its adopters at the expense of permanent added complexity
for the specification and for the system.
i realize that in today's client/server model
Philip Homburg writes:
> DNSSEC has a lot of moving parts that needed to be in place compared
> to DoH.
Yes, certainly there are many differences between the two, some of
which speak to the challenges of DELEG when looked at through the lens
of DNSSEC. The core point was that motivation as a
>When DNSSEC came out, I admit I was kind of surprised to see how long
>it took to be used. I thought it would be adopted faster. There was
>insufficient motivation when the system worked well enough and the
>problem being addressed was, to many people, largely theoretical.
>
>When DoH was
Paul Wouters writes:
> I tried to show some of of these in my "Costs of deleg" slide.
> A new RRtype has a fairly big cost meassures in years, both in
> terms of DNS software, DNS deployment and worse, in Registrar
> deployment for Registrant webui elements.
Unfortunately, I know of no good way
On 1/31/24 15:33, Paul Wouters wrote:
A new RRtype has a fairly big cost meassures in years, both in
terms of DNS software, DNS deployment and worse, in Registrar
deployment for Registrant webui elements.
Re-using DS is not nice, but neither was Pseudo OPT, EDNS0, etc.
But it gains us a
On Jan 31, 2024, at 09:56, Ralf Weber wrote:
>
> Moin!
>
> While this is true, there are a lot of players from different part
> of the ecosystem that want to work on DELEG (see contributors)
I am not saying don’t do it. I am saying we need to understand the cost and
benefits. For example, do
Moin!
On 31 Jan 2024, at 15:33, Paul Wouters wrote:
> I tried to show some of of these in my "Costs of deleg" slide.
> A new RRtype has a fairly big cost meassures in years, both in
> terms of DNS software, DNS deployment and worse, in Registrar
> deployment for Registrant webui elements.
While
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, Philip Homburg wrote:
Something I wonder about, certainly after the interim, is how do we discuess
with the wider DNS community the trade-offs that are available in de design
of DELEG such that we get good feedback about priorities.
For example, the current design used two
Something I wonder about, certainly after the interim, is how do we discuess
with the wider DNS community the trade-offs that are available in de design
of DELEG such that we get good feedback about priorities.
For example, the current design used two contraints:
1) no creative (ab)use of DS
