Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-jabley-dnsop-as112-dname-01.txt

2013-10-14 Thread George Michaelson
Worth logging a fault with the maintainers of the distro(s)? It seems to be DNAME in reverse V6 may well be useful, albeit as you say not relevant to AS112 On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Tony Finch wrote: > Joe Abley wrote: > > > > Geoff Huston and George Michaelson were kind enough to run a

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-jabley-dnsop-as112-dname-01.txt

2013-10-14 Thread Tony Finch
Joe Abley wrote: > > Geoff Huston and George Michaelson were kind enough to run an initial > experiment this week to try and find problems with DNAME support in the > wild. They did not find any; DNAME support (for the purposes of AS112) > seems more than adequate. This document (below) includes a

[DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-jabley-dnsop-as112-dname-01.txt

2013-10-12 Thread Joe Abley
Hi all, In Berlin, Warren and I presented two approaches to expanding the AS112 project beyond that currently deployed (and described in RFC6304) with the primary goal of making it practical to add and remove zones from the system without requiring fine-grained management of a system that is on