For the limit on total number of connections: "Absent any other
information,
150 is a reasonable value for this limit in most cases."
[...]
Maybe this could use a clarification that 150 is good advice only if
you _don't_ have any "TCP-only" clients, like e.g. DoT stubs?
I would not be so
On 07. 09. 21 18:46, Wessels, Duane wrote:
Dan, thanks for the review. Responses are inline.
On Sep 1, 2021, at 3:12 AM, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
wrote:
Minor issues:
1. In Section 4.1:
DNS clients MAY also enable TFO when possible.
Maybe I do not fully understand the intent
Hi Duane,
Thank you for your answer and for addressing my concerns. I am fine with
the proposed resolutions.
Regards,
Dan
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 7:46 PM Wessels, Duane wrote:
> Dan, thanks for the review. Responses are inline.
>
>
>
> > On Sep 1, 2021, at 3:12 AM, Dan Romascanu via
Dan, thanks for the review. Responses are inline.
> On Sep 1, 2021, at 3:12 AM, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
>
> Minor issues:
>
> 1. In Section 4.1:
>
>> DNS clients MAY also enable TFO when possible.
>
> Maybe I do not fully understand the intent here, but 'MAY ... when
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
