Op 2 okt 2023 om 11:04 heeft libor.peltan het volgende
geschreven:
> I would even rather see a recommendation that firewalls and middleboxes
> don't do any kind of DNS packet handling. Why should they? DNS traffic is for
> DNS servers and they are the most capable entity for handling them,
I would even rather see a recommendation that firewalls and middleboxes
don't do any kind of DNS packet handling. Why should they? DNS traffic
is for DNS servers and they are the most capable entity for handling
them, including FORMERR responses on wrongly formatted queries.
Libor
Dne 29.
Op 29 sep 2023 om 00:09 heeft Robert Edmonds het volgende
geschreven:
> noticed that Section 4 of the draft states:
>
> Firewalls that process DNS messages in order to eliminate unwanted
> traffic SHOULD treat messages with OPCODE = 0 and QDCOUNT > 1 as
> malformed traffic. See Section
Hi,
I noticed that Section 4 of the draft states:
Firewalls that process DNS messages in order to eliminate unwanted
traffic SHOULD treat messages with OPCODE = 0 and QDCOUNT > 1 as
malformed traffic. See Section 4 of [RFC8906] for further guidance.
However, I couldn't find the
Hi Eric,
On 28 Sep 2023, at 18:15, Eric Orth wrote:
> Minor remaining complaints (that I'm not going to fight over, so ignore if
> you really disagree):
> * I think all the stuff now in the appendix would be even better as a
> separate Informational draft. In my mind, appendix is acceptable,
I think this generally resolves my main concerns about the previous draft
hiding the normative changes behind all the history and justification.
Thanks for the update.
Minor remaining complaints (that I'm not going to fight over, so ignore if
you really disagree):
* I think all the stuff now in
Thanks Joe for pulling this together.
tim
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:57 AM Ted Lemon wrote:
> Thanks for the update. I think this does the job. I could do without the
> appendix, but I understand the urge to fully document. :)
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 9:40 AM Joe Abley wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
Thanks for the update. I think this does the job. I could do without the
appendix, but I understand the urge to fully document. :)
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 9:40 AM Joe Abley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This version mainly incorporates feedback from the room at the last
> meeting and relate to document
Hi all,
This version mainly incorporates feedback from the room at the last meeting and
relate to document clarity; the advice is unchanged.
Joe
> On 28 Sep 2023, at 15:21, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
> Internet-Draft draft-bellis-dnsop-qdcount-is-one-01.txt is now available. It
> is
Internet-Draft draft-bellis-dnsop-qdcount-is-one-01.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF.
Title: In the DNS, QDCOUNT is (usually) One
Authors: Ray Bellis
Joe Abley
Name:
10 matches
Mail list logo
