Hello,
On Fri, 2021-02-19 at 13:21 -0800, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
> On 2021-02-19 18:45, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> > However, "burning" a new RR just for this purpose seems to me to
> > not be necessary, so I favour the scheme in 5.6 using a TXT
> > record instead.
>
> My reading of RFC 5507
On 2021-02-19 18:45, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> However, "burning" a new RR just for this purpose seems to me to
> not be necessary, so I favour the scheme in 5.6 using a TXT
> record instead.
My reading of RFC 5507 "Design Choices When Expanding the DNS"
ยง6 (
> During the last hackathon at IETF-109, a new idea emerged where the
> version of a member zone in a catalog (indicated by the member zone's
> SOA serial number) is also in the catalog. This can help ensuring
> dissemination of member zones in a catalog from the primary to the
> secondary
Hi All,
This new version has two new sections: "The Serial Property" and
"Implementation Status".
During the last hackathon at IETF-109, a new idea emerged where the
version of a member zone in a catalog (indicated by the member zone's
SOA serial number) is also in the catalog. This can help
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : DNS Catalog Zones
Authors : Peter van Dijk
Libor Peltan
