On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Ralph Dolmans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but it is not clear to me whether this
> document (-06) allows generation of NODATA answers using matching NSEC
> records that do not have the QTYPE set in the type bitmap.
>
> I don't see it explicitly me
On 11/25/16 3:59 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
Thank you VERY much - I really appreciate the help.
I merged all the changes, other than those in a17e0f1 (remove
redundant quotes from rfc4035 and recommendation updates) -- this is
because the RFC Editor really wants an "Updates to RFC" section.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Matthijs Mekking
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This document looks almost good to me. I have some nit comments.
>
> - Page 3, Section 1, says a DNS negative cache is used to cache the fact
> that a name does not exist. But it also caches if the name is valid but
> there are no
At Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:36:04 +0100,
Ralph Dolmans wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but it is not clear to me whether this
> document (-06) allows generation of NODATA answers using matching NSEC
> records that do not have the QTYPE set in the type bitmap.
>
> I don't see it explicitly mentio
Hi,
This document looks almost good to me. I have some nit comments.
- Page 3, Section 1, says a DNS negative cache is used to cache the fact
that a name does not exist. But it also caches if the name is valid but
there are no records for the type. Perhaps:
"..., and is used to cache the fact th
ould be happy to review next revision. In case I am silent bug me
>> until
>> I do the review.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Ondřej Surý -- Technical Fellow
>>
>> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.-- Laboratoře CZ.NIC
>>
se work for you, and I'll push a new version
once I've incorporated more comments.
W
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Ondřej Surý -- Technical Fellow
>
> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.-- Laboratoře CZ.NIC
> Milesovska 5, 130 00 Praha 3, Czech Repub
Hi,
Maybe I'm missing something, but it is not clear to me whether this
document (-06) allows generation of NODATA answers using matching NSEC
records that do not have the QTYPE set in the type bitmap.
I don't see it explicitly mentioned. The RFC4035 update in section 7
seems to allow it (or at l
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 15:09, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I read the document and I believe that the document goes to far
> to recommend the vendors how to implement the knobs in their
> software here:
>
> It is recommended that resolvers that implement Aggressive Negative
> Caching prov
-dra...@ietf.org
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Cc: "dnsop"
Sent: Wednesday, 16 November, 2016 03:41:29
Subject: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-06.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the D
130 00 Praha 3, Czech Republic
> mailto:ondrej.s...@nic.czhttps://nic.cz/
> ------------
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
>> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
>> Cc: "dnsop"
>&g
mailto:ondrej.s...@nic.czhttps://nic.cz/
- Original Message -
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
> Cc: "dnsop"
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 November, 2016 03:41:29
> Subject: [DNSOP] I-D Action:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
Title : Aggressive use of NSEC/NSEC3
Authors : Kazunori Fujiwara
Akira Kato
13 matches
Mail list logo
