I have a very minor comment on this (excellent) draft:
Assuming it gets approved and published, could the relevant elements also
be filed as "Errata" on the respective RFCs, so they are easy to find and
apply?
Not sure if that is appropriate, but given the implications of not doing
what this draft
Hello DNSOP,
with thanks to Matthijs and Paul who commented on -03:
* the 'incremental signer exception' is now part of all relevant
document updates
* added an explanation for the upgraded requirement level
On Thu, 2021-02-18 at 09:15 -0800, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> A New
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : NSEC and NSEC3 TTLs and NSEC Aggressive Use
Author : Peter van Dijk
Filename:
