Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt

On 10 Mar 2018, at 17:26, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: this proposal. (in that sense, I'm curious: is there other DNS developer than ISC that is interested in implementing this proposal?) Yes. PowerDNS has wanted something like this for years but we never got around to writing it down. We are

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt

Hi Jinmei On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:59:11AM -0700, 神明達哉 wrote: > > > this proposal. (in that sense, I'm curious: is there other DNS > > > developer than ISC that is interested in implementing this proposal?) > > > > So far: I was told that PowerDNS has implemented a plug-in/script that > >

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt

even after talking to muks@isc offline, i still don't understand why the original metazone proposal can't simply be standardized. ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt

At Sat, 10 Mar 2018 21:56:15 +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > > I've read draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04. I see the motivation > > of automating the synchronization of primary/secondary configurations. > > Personally, however, I'm not (yet?) convinced that this should be >

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt

if anybody wants to work on metazones, i encourage it, and would be happy to remain involved if desired. ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt

(speaking not as chair but DNS operator) At the last OARC, my co-worker did a lightning talk on his deployment of MetaZones ( https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/27/session/7/contribution/39/material/slides/0.pdf ) He attempted to contact the authors of the catalog-zones draft (as did I) to talk

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt

Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > We settled on using a zone representation as it used existing zone > transfer protocol (and authorizations) and would involve minimal changes > for both implementations and operations vs. inventing a new protocol. I want to emphasize this point. In my

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt

Hi Jinmei On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:08:37AM -0800, 神明達哉 wrote: > At Sat, 3 Mar 2018 22:07:57 +, > Ray Bellis wrote: > > > > Abstract: This document describes a method for automatic DNS zone > > > provisioning among DNS primary and secondary nameservers by storing > > >

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt

At Sat, 3 Mar 2018 22:07:57 +, Ray Bellis wrote: > > Abstract: This document describes a method for automatic DNS zone > > provisioning among DNS primary and secondary nameservers by storing > > and transferring the catalog of zones to be provisioned as one or > > more

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt

On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Ray Bellis wrote: > > > On 01/03/2018 12:37, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > > Abstract: This document describes a method for automatic DNS zone > > provisioning among DNS primary and secondary nameservers by storing > > and transferring the

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt

On 01/03/2018 12:37, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > Abstract: This document describes a method for automatic DNS zone > provisioning among DNS primary and secondary nameservers by storing > and transferring the catalog of zones to be provisioned as one or > more regular DNS zones. This

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : DNS Catalog Zones Authors : Mukund Sivaraman Stephen Morris