Eric Orth writes:
> > "Because long EXTRA-TEXT fields may trigger truncation,
> > which is undesirable given the supplemental nature of
> > EDE."
>
> I left this sentence as a hybrid of what you suggested (removing most of
> the second half), leaving in the supplemental
Donald Eastlake writes:
> > I also do not add the "reserved" section since the IANA ranges were
> > discussed extensively and the current number ranges are the result of a
> > consensus I didn't want to have one person change without a lot of
> > backup agreement.
>
> This is the only serious
Hi Wes,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:35 PM Wes Hardaker wrote:
>
> Donald Eastlake writes:
>
> > My apologies for getting in some minor comments so late. I do not
> > suggest any technical changes. However, at least to my eye, there are
> > some little glitches and editorial changes I would
Donald Eastlake writes:
> My apologies for getting in some minor comments so late. I do not
> suggest any technical changes. However, at least to my eye, there are
> some little glitches and editorial changes I would suggest.
Thanks for the detailed review, comments and suggestions Donald.
Hi,
My apologies for getting in some minor comments so late. I do not suggest
any technical changes. However, at least to my eye, there are some little
glitches and editorial changes I would suggest.
Among the glitches I see are incorrect internal cross references, old
implementation key word
The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
(dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Extended DNS Errors'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive
