Re: [DNSOP] dnsop meeting agenda?

Hi I've been trying to push out a version but has been tied up in all day work meetings this week with poor internet sadly. We should have one up today. Tim On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:32 AM 神明達哉 wrote: > There's still no link to meeting agenda of dnsop sessions on the > IETF104 agenda page:

[DNSOP] dnsop meeting agenda?

There's still no link to meeting agenda of dnsop sessions on the IETF104 agenda page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/agenda/ Is it some kind of operation error or is the agenda still unavailable? If it's the latter, when can we expect to see it? -- JINMEI, Tatuya

Re: [DNSOP] meeting agenda?

im > > > On 3/9/18 14:03, 神明達哉 wrote: >> >> dnsop meeting agenda hasn't yet been uploaded on >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda.html >> >> Is there at least an unofficial meeting agenda so we can have more >> specif

Re: [DNSOP] meeting agenda?

Hi I have one and was waiting for Suzanne to land in Puerto Rico and we can confirm but you should see that soon enough. thanks! tim On 3/9/18 14:03, 神明達哉 wrote: dnsop meeting agenda hasn't yet been uploaded on https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda.html Is there at least

[DNSOP] meeting agenda?

dnsop meeting agenda hasn't yet been uploaded on https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda.html Is there at least an unofficial meeting agenda so we can have more specific idea of what will be discussed? Thanks. -- JINMEI, Tatuya ___ DNSOP mailing

Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

Thanks All, What I do want to say if the authors will be in Yokohama, I will gladly sit down with them and work through the issues raised here. My personal opinion is I do want new voices and ideas to be heard, and I feel it's one of my roles as co-chair to offer assistance to folks

Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

On Friday, October 30, 2015 01:52:18 AM yaojk wrote: > > in order to utilize expensive high > > bandwith discussion time > > > > > I agree with you about this point. We should not waste the high bandwith > discussion time.We should fully utilize the expensive f2f discusstion > time. yao,

Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

On 10/28/15 7:37 AM, yaojk wrote: Hello http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/agenda?item=agenda-94-dnsop.html From the agenda above, I see that it doesn't include my draft discussion. Could you kindly assignee 5 minutes to introduce the draft- yao-dnsop-root-cache？ Thanks Jiankang Yao Hi

Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

> 在 2015年10月28日，19:45，Tim Wicinski 写道： > > > > >> On 10/28/15 7:37 AM, yaojk wrote: >> Hello >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/agenda?item=agenda-94-dnsop.html >> >> From the agenda above, I see that it doesn't include my draft >> discussion. Could you kindly

Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

Hello, AD here. On 10/28/15 5:24 AM, yaojk wrote: > > > > >> 在 2015年10月28日，19:45，Tim Wicinski 写道： >> >> >> >> >>> On 10/28/15 7:37 AM, yaojk wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/agenda?item=agenda-94-dnsop.html >>> >>> From the agenda above, I see that

Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

Thanks, Joel. As Joel points out for those who may not know-- the decision not to add this draft to the agenda for the f2f meeting next week is within the discretion of the WG chairs. However, in the interests of transparency, we have no problem explaining the decision. THe draft

Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

On 10/28/15 4:24 AM, yaojk wrote: It might be your power as chairman. But I think that your arguments to block the draft discussion is not reasonable. If I may take some liberty here ... discussion of the draft is not blocked. Indeed, the primary place for working group discussions to take

[DNSOP] Meeting Agenda for Prague

All We've requested our normal 2 hour slot. We are also experimenting with an additional 1 hour slot that we could use if 1) it's after the initial session; and 2) we have actual topics to discuss that we run out of time for. Please send any agenda requests if you would like some time, and