Re: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

Hi Wes, thanks! See below. > Am 09.07.2016 um 00:28 schrieb Wes Hardaker : > > "Mirja Kuehlewind" writes: > >> 1) Shouldn't/can't section 3.1.13. (UDP size limits) also specify a >> real test? > > I don't think it's possible to easily test this,

Re: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

"Mirja Kuehlewind" writes: > 1) Shouldn't/can't section 3.1.13. (UDP size limits) also specify a >real test? I don't think it's possible to easily test this, sadly, without a target set containing different deterministic response sizes. We could probably strike the

[DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph,