On Mar 24, 2019, at 07:42, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings again. As y'all have seen over the past few weeks, the discussion
> of where DNS resolution should happen and over what transports has caused
> some people to use conflicting terms. As a possible solution to the
> terminology problems,
DoT and DoH seem fine. But maybe skip the acronym for Do53 - just call it
conventional DNS or unencrypted DNS, or DNS over Port 53. Compared to
RDoT/ADoT/DaT/DaO however, Do53 is the least offensive IMO.
I don’t think you do much for clarity with RDoT and ADoT - seems mostly to be
used because
ts nice to have a thread where bike shedding of terms is actually on topic,
and the point of the draft.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 9:39 AM Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> >
> I don't know if these terms are already defined somewhere else, but the
> distinction that I've found most useful in the DoH discu
> Il 24 marzo 2019 alle 7.42 Paul Hoffman ha scritto:
>
>
> Greetings again. As y'all have seen over the past few weeks, the discussion
> of where DNS resolution should happen and over what transports has caused
> some people to use conflicting terms. As a possible solution to the
> terminolo
Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings again. As y'all have seen over the past few weeks, the
> discussion of where DNS resolution should happen and over what
> transports has caused some people to use conflicting terms. As a
> possible solution to the terminology problems, I am proposing a few
> abbrevi
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 06:42:53AM +, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> to the terminology problems, I am proposing a few abbreviations that
> people can use in these discussions. The draft below, if adopted by the
> DNSOP WG, would update RFC 8499 with a small set of abbreviations.
Hi Paul,
Thank you
The chairs spoke with Paul yesterday, and we are in agreement, if the
working group feels these are useful terms
to be added (and several of them are in common use already), we're good on
adopting and fast tracking the whole
document.
Tim
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 8:02 AM Paul Hoffman wrote:
> G
Greetings again. As y'all have seen over the past few weeks, the discussion of
where DNS resolution should happen and over what transports has caused some
people to use conflicting terms. As a possible solution to the terminology
problems, I am proposing a few abbreviations that people can use i
