Re: [DNSOP] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-03-20 Thread joel jaeggli
07 would be greatly appreciated. joel On 2/24/16 10:27 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hi David, > > All of those changes look good to me. Happy to clear the discuss > when you post -07. > > Cheers, > S. > > On 25/02/16 01:12, Dave Lawrence wrote: >> Stephen Farrell writes: >>> Section 11.3, I

Re: [DNSOP] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-02-24 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hi David, All of those changes look good to me. Happy to clear the discuss when you post -07. Cheers, S. On 25/02/16 01:12, Dave Lawrence wrote: > Stephen Farrell writes: >> Section 11.3, I like that we're recommending that ECS be >> disabled by default, but want to check one thing. This says:

Re: [DNSOP] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-02-24 Thread Dave Lawrence
Stephen Farrell writes: > Section 11.3, I like that we're recommending that ECS be > disabled by default, but want to check one thing. This says: > "Due to the high cache pressure introduced by ECS, the feature > SHOULD be disabled in all default configurations." Does that > mean that all servers

[DNSOP] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-01-20 Thread Stephen Farrell
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-06: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please ref