Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

That works for me. Cheers Terry On 4/08/2016, 8:53 AM, "Wes Hardaker" wrote: >Terry Manderson writes: > >> Hi Spencer, >> >> On 14/07/2016, 12:57 PM, "Spencer Dawkins at IETF" >> wrote: >>> >>>Terry, I like where

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Terry Manderson writes: > Hi Spencer, > > On 14/07/2016, 12:57 PM, "Spencer Dawkins at IETF" > wrote: >> >>Terry, I like where you're headed, but just to ask the obvious question, >>are you thinking the draft would, or would not, also

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Spencer, On 14/07/2016, 12:57 PM, "Spencer Dawkins at IETF" wrote: > >Terry, I like where you're headed, but just to ask the obvious question, >are you thinking the draft would, or would not, also contain something >like "at the time this document was approved,

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

This is Not My Yes, but ... On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:28 AM, Terry Manderson wrote: > Hi Wes, > > Thanks for responding. > > I'll trim to only the the remaining items needing a response, and express > my appreciation at the clarified items. > > On 9/07/2016, 9:53

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Wes, Thanks for responding. I'll trim to only the the remaining items needing a response, and express my appreciation at the clarified items. On 9/07/2016, 9:53 AM, "iesg on behalf of Wes Hardaker" wrote: >"Terry Manderson"

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Terry Manderson" writes: > Abstract: s/outline potential/outlines potential/ Hmm. My version already has that. Yay! > s1.1 > second bullet, perhaps you could just say "not DNSSEC aware" to be > parsimonious with words > third bullet '"middle-boxes" actively'?

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Terry Manderson" writes: > In section 4, the second "Note", I urge you to reconsider using the term > "crap-ware", and words "stupid", "crap".. these make this document look > and sound very poor for an IETF published document. Knowing the > intelligence of the

[DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)