So, now that this draft is re-activated, I'm perusing old postings
...
On 12/11/2015 12:46 PM, Bob Harold wrote:
_adsp. has trailing dot, none of the others do.
The current model is to ignore 'subordinate' underscore names, such as
_adsp and treat them as out of scope.
pgpkeys missing le
On 12/11/2015 10:46 AM, Bob Harold wrote:
Looks useful. A few concerns:
_adsp. has trailing dot, none of the others do.
pgpkeys missing leading _
_im listed twice, but with different rfc's - should at least put the
entries next to each other
Bob, Good catches. Thanks! (Turns out that _pres
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:56 PM, IETF Secretariat <
ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> The DNSOP WG has placed draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf in state
> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski)
>
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-crocker-dns-att
The DNSOP WG has placed draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf/
Comment:
There is useful need for this to be documented, for better or for worse.
_
