> On 21 Oct 2018, at 17:40, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote:
>
>> From: Vladimír Čunát
>> On 10/17/18 11:18 PM, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote:
>>> 4. In my opinion, Ed25519 is best algorithm some yars later.
>>> If the document describes both current RECOMMENDATIONS and
>>> RECOMMENDATIONS some years
Fujiwara-san,
I don’t exactly understand why such table would be better than existing text
that say:
> 3.2. DNSKEY Algorithm Recommendation
>
>Operation recommendation for new and existing deployments.
>
>Due to industry-wide trend to move to elliptic curve cryptography,
>the
On 10/17/18 11:18 PM, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote:
> 4. In my opinion, Ed25519 is best algorithm some yars later.
>If the document describes both current RECOMMENDATIONS and
>RECOMMENDATIONS some years later, we can plan.
I agree, but the last paragraph of 3.1 seems to express that
What I want to say about draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-02 are below:
1. About chapter composition
If section 3.2 is "recommendations for operators",
Section 3.1 and Section 3.3 are recommendations for software developpers
and TLD/Root operators.
# Sometimes TLD/Root do not
for
draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update
Current versions of the draft is available here:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Cscott.rose%40nist.gov%7C308a6e44bb084b0837eb08d62865e3a1
WGLC comment to draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-02
Section 3.2 is "recommendations for operators".
There is texts that discuss ECDSAP256SHA256 only in section 3.2.
However, RSASHA256 is still usable.
Please add text about other algorithms.
if there is a table similar to section 3.1, it will
Tim,
I have reviewed the document and it is ready for publication
Olafur
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 2:51 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> The chairs and the authors of this document feel that the
> document is in solid shape to proceed to WGLC.
>
>
> This starts a Working Group Last C
den Velvindron wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:51 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>>
>>
>> The chairs and the authors of this document feel that the
>> document is in solid shape to proceed to WGLC.
>>
>>
>> This starts a Working Group Last Call f
on this.
thanks
Tim
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 8:51 AM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> The chairs and the authors of this document feel that the
> document is in solid shape to proceed to WGLC.
>
>
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update
>
> Curre
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:51 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>
> The chairs and the authors of this document feel that the
> document is in solid shape to proceed to WGLC.
>
>
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update
>
> Current versions of
The chairs and the authors of this document feel that the
document is in solid shape to proceed to WGLC.
This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update
Current versions of the draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm
11 matches
Mail list logo
