On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 08:58 +0200, Petr Špaček wrote:
> On 08. 04. 21 16:39, Ben Schwartz wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback, Petr. I think the easiest solution is to relax
> > the requirement language. I've proposed a change here:
> > https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc/pull/313
> >
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https
>
> Current versions of the draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/>
>
On 18. 03. 21 21:53, Tim Wicinski wrote:
This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https
Current versions of the draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-ht
Hello WG,
On 3/18/21 9:53 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments.
> If this does not seem appropriate please speak out.
> If someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please
> speak out with your reasons.
I re-read the draft-03 last week
This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https
Current versions of the draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/
The Current Intended Status of this document is: Proposed Standard
Please review the draft and offer relevant
