At 23:08 +0200 6/22/10, teemu.savolai...@nokia.com wrote:
The hospital that does surgery on my foot probably gives me those
inserts as well.
What was unclear in the analogy is that the inserts are custom made,
from a prescription. So, no, the hospital would not likely have the
(same)
Hi,
The problem in such discussions is harm to whom? The harm is that
is we incorrectly solve this, we harm the overall architecture of the
Internet. The issues I read pertained to the host, not the DNS,
hence, to prevent harm to the architecture, the solution lies in the
host.
I see this
Because of foot surgery, I have to wear special inserts to my shoes.
It would be good if all the shoes would have the insert so that I
wouldn't have to remove and insert them each time I change shoes.
But building in the support I need to the shoes means that others
then can't use my shoes.
I'm in this list to clarify if this technology proposal causes issues for DNS:)
But if the problem is seen as a host issue, not DNS, then this probably does
not cause harm?
So from DNS system point of view, do you see any issues if some networks would
provide policies for some hosts to perform
At 10:15 +0200 6/18/10, teemu.savolai...@nokia.com wrote:
I'm in this list to clarify if this technology proposal causes
issues for DNS:)
But if the problem is seen as a host issue, not DNS, then this probably does
not cause harm?
The problem in such discussions is harm to whom? The harm is
Edward,
Not necessarily. What I mean is that it is up to the multi-homed
device to decide what interfaces are candidates (for the pending data
transmission) and consult the DNS on each interface. However, what
Yes, but how to decide that? Some information is required, and this draft
Hi Edward, and thank you for comments.
The current state of multi-homed hosts do use interface specific DNS server
lists, as described in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mif-current-practices/
If an interface is chosen before a DNS server there is no problem in selecting
the DNS
I'm going to answer this in a general, architectural approach level,
and not specific to particular issues.
At 16:21 +0200 6/16/10, teemu.savolai...@nokia.com wrote:
So from your point of view, it would be best for a host to contact
DNS server's
of all interfaces, and then use
At 14:22 +0200 6/15/10, teemu.savolai...@nokia.com wrote:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-savolainen-mif-dns-server-selection/
Comments on the draft.
In general, I think that architecturally a host has to treat each
interface somewhat independently and then choose the interface to use
