draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-13.txt (Peter van Dijk)
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Viktor Dukhovni
>> To: dnsop-cha...@ietf.org
>> Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
>> Bcc:
>> Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:06:3
uch time as
> some evidence of support emerges, and in the meantime use the timeslot
> for more realistically productive proposals?
>
> --
> Viktor.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------ Forwarded message --
> From: Viktor Dukhovni
> To: dnsop@ietf.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
>
On Jul 16, 2023, at 15:53, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>
> I should perhaps have stated the technical criteria on which I consider
> the proposal non-viable. To whit:
>
>- The proposed protocol lacks all downgrade resistance.
>- Without a signed delegation from the parent, the existence
> On 17 Jul 2023, at 05:53, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 03:06:35PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> I see that draft-dnsop-dnssec-extension-pkix is included on the IETF117
>> dnsop agenda.
>>
>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dnsop-dnssec-extension-pkix/
>>
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 03:06:35PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> I see that draft-dnsop-dnssec-extension-pkix is included on the IETF117 dnsop
> agenda.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dnsop-dnssec-extension-pkix/
>
> I haven't seen prior discussion of this item on the list,
I see that draft-dnsop-dnssec-extension-pkix is included on the IETF117 dnsop
agenda.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dnsop-dnssec-extension-pkix/
I haven't seen prior discussion of this item on the list, and,
personally, rather suspect it unlikely to gain meaningful support from
the
