From: Tony Finch d...@dotat.at
It is an interesting draft and I can see why the problem concerns you. The
dummy DS is a clever work-around, but it is a pity about the validation bug
in Google public DNS.
Thanks. I'm not sure that the validation error is a bug or not.
I wonder about the
Hi,
I believe there may of been some take away from Vancouver on direction.
I have a hand written note on this, but it was lost in the discussion on
Key Exchanges.
I will followup with you after tonight's meeting, and apologies for
dropping this.
tim
On 3/6/14, 5:57 PM,
From: Olafur Gudmundsson o...@ogud.com
Your calculations on the amplification are good illustration, but assume that
the resolvers use
the parental provided NS set, not the child side provided NS set.
In the case of google.co.jp.
JP side NS has TTL of 1 day but google.co.jp side has is 96
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 03:03:40AM +0900, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote:
...
I would like to know whether the increase of DS queries are observed
commonly or not. (with small NCACHE TTL value)
We are observing around the same % of qps but still need to confirm
the other characteristics.
Fred
On Mar 5, 2014, at 10:23 AM, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote:
Dear Chairs and WG participants,
I updated draft-fujiwara-dnsop-ds-query-increase this Janurary.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fujiwara-dnsop-ds-query-increase
Recent DS traffic increase seems not high, I did not request time
