Re: [DNSOP] grave erroneous statement in draft 4641bis-03

2010-10-20 Thread Olaf Kolkman
On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Jelte Jansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 the introduction suggests that the root has not been signed yet. ;-) In version 05, to appear before the cut-off it reads: At the time of writing -the root has just been signed and

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-key-timing-00

2010-10-20 Thread Matthijs Mekking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/20/2010 01:03 AM, Suzanne Woolf wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:22:25AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:26:27AM +0200, Johan Ihren wrote: B. Better to publish what we have and initiate work on a -bis document

Re: [DNSOP] 4641bis (draft 3 and 4) review - largely 5011 related

2010-10-20 Thread Olaf Kolkman
Clearly I am trying to get a (hopefully WG last call ready) version 05 of the document out by the deadline. Some comments in-line based on specific feedback you provided. On Aug 5, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Matthijs Mekking wrote: The KSK RFC5011-based rollover method says that the removed key

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-key-timing-00

2010-10-20 Thread Olafur Gudmundsson
On 20/10/2010 4:32 AM, Matthijs Mekking wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/20/2010 01:03 AM, Suzanne Woolf wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:22:25AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:26:27AM +0200, Johan Ihren wrote: B. Better to publish what we