Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation

2020-04-20 Thread Gavin McCullagh
Hi, I'm new to posting on this list, so please accept my advance apologies if I make any novice errors or posted this in the wrong place. Apologies also for the long email. :-) I can't claim to have the same detailed knowledge of the protocol as the authors of this draft. All the same, I've

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-pwouters-powerbind

2020-04-20 Thread Paul Wouters
On Apr 20, 2020, at 14:35, Dave Lawrence wrote: > > I support adoption, with the caveat that either the draft name should > be updated with something like s/powerbind/delegation-only-dnssec/, or > the draft should describe why it is being called "powerbind". The name was a joke. It is not used

[DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-pwouters-powerbind in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2020-04-20 Thread IETF Secretariat
The DNSOP WG has placed draft-pwouters-powerbind in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tim Wicinski) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pwouters-powerbind/ ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org

[DNSOP] Document Action: 'Multi Signer DNSSEC models' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-05.txt)

2020-04-20 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Multi Signer DNSSEC models' (draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-05.txt) as Informational RFC This document is the product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari and Robert Wilton. A

[DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-pwouters-powerbind

2020-04-20 Thread Tim Wicinski
All, As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run regular call for adoptions over next few months. >From the presentation during the last meeting, there was interest in adtoping this document around the idea of DNSSEC transparency. This interest comes the privacy

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-pwouters-powerbind

2020-04-20 Thread Dave Lawrence
I support adoption, with the caveat that either the draft name should be updated with something like s/powerbind/delegation-only-dnssec/, or the draft should describe why it is being called "powerbind". ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org

Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-02

2020-04-20 Thread Eric Orth
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 6:20 AM Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > Hello, > > First off, I have started implementing support for SVCB and HTTPSSVC as > part of > the dnspython library [0] and I'd be interested in doing some interop > testing > with other people's implementations. > > I also have a few

Re: [DNSOP] Domain Name System Operations (dnsop) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-04-23

2020-04-20 Thread Benno Overeinder
Dear DNSOP WG, We have added another agenda item to our interim meeting next Thursday: ### Use of GOST 2012 Signature Algorithms in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource Records for DNSSEC - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-belyavskiy-rfc5933-bis/ - Dmitry Belyavsky, 15min - Chairs Action: