Hi Peter,
On 04/11/2022 00:52, Peter Thomassen wrote:
On 11/3/22 17:44, Benno Overeinder wrote:
Questions:
1b. Does this also mean changing the definition of "out-of-bailiwick"
to a more historical definition as well? Or do we still need a
term for in-domain name server,
Hi Libor,
On 04/11/2022 12:15, libor.peltan wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to understand this, but not sure if I do. What I see is:
"The definition of bailiwick (in-b, out-of-b) is messed up and any
further use of it in normative documents will probably lead to
ambiguities. The proposed tactic is to
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 10:29 AM Vladimír Čunát
wrote:
> OK, thanks. The changes are certainly improvements, in my eyes. Below
> I'll further clarify what I meant.
>
> 4033 indicates it does not make much sense to keep a RRSIG whose validity
> period has expired ( TTL > Validity period).
>
>
Hi James,
Thanks for the review. Please see inline my responses as well as the
changes below:
https://github.com/mglt/draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements/commit/074ff71844b076b6e83ba8e0134a224b5f5617f9
Yours,
Daniel
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 2:07 AM James Gannon via Datatracker <
