Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] on private use TLDS: .interNAL -> .LAN

2024-03-06 Thread S Moonesamy
Hi Toerless, At 10:53 AM 27-02-2024, Toerless Eckert wrote: I don't think ICANN are the authoritative experts to define how to best operate private DNS zones, especially not modifications to configs if not source code to automatically filter out DNS requests for that zone to avoid the overload

Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9520 (7838)

2024-03-06 Thread Wessels, Duane
This errata seems to be valid. I have no idea why the DOI reference changed, but it appears to have changed since it was added to the document in November/December last year. DW > On Mar 5, 2024, at 9:02 PM, RFC Errata System > wrote: > > Caution: This email originated from outside the

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-toorop-dnsop-ranking-dns-data-00.txt

2024-03-06 Thread Wessels, Duane
Hi, some initial thoughts: RFC 2181 says "Data from a zone transfer, other than glue” but this draft doesn’t make any exceptions for glue or non-authoritative data from a zone transfer. Is that intentional? Should RFC 8767 stale data be ranked differently than fresh data? Should EDNS Client

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-toorop-dnsop-ranking-dns-data-00.txt

2024-03-06 Thread Willem Toorop
Op 06-03-2024 om 22:06 schreef Wessels, Duane: Hi, some initial thoughts: RFC 2181 says "Data from a zone transfer, other than glue” but this draft doesn’t make any exceptions for glue or non-authoritative data from a zone transfer.  Is that intentional? Well, RFC 2181 had a uniquely broad