Hi,
I have updated distributed DNS implementation in Ipv6.
Please give your comments.
Thanks.
Dr. Lican Huang
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-licanhuang-dnsop-distributeddns-04.txt
Date:Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:45:01 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (黄理灿) writes:
Hi,
I have updated distributed DNS implementation in Ipv6.
Please give your comments.
Thanks.
Dr. Lican Huang
thank you for your work on this. i find no support for this assertion:
1. Introduction
Although DNS becomes a vital
Paul Vixie (vixie) writes:
therefore while i find your proposed solution to be of high quality, there
is a cost in overall system complexity for adding a virtual routing layer to
the DNS, which would have to be justified by a much more complete problem
statement and an objective analysis of
Paul Vixie (vixie) writes:
therefore while i find your proposed solution to be of high quality, there
is a cost in overall system complexity for adding a virtual routing layer to
the DNS, which would have to be justified by a much more complete problem
statement and an objective analysis
Dr. Lican Huang
It is perfectly clear now that the current IPv6 Root DNS architecture is
deeply flawed. It is strange that Paul Vixie asserts that there are no
future load problems, since Paul Vixie has previously asserted that DNS
Anycast is a solution to these future load problems. RFC1546
