I am interesting to find information about past or possible current
interest regarding the support of a Batch single call of multiple
query packets.
If it doesn't already exist or not considered in the past as an
unfeasible concept, I am interest in seeing if this is something worth
Hector Santos wrote:
I am interesting to find information about past or possible current
interest regarding the support of a Batch single call of multiple query
packets.
If it doesn't already exist or not considered in the past as an
unfeasible concept, I am interest in seeing if this
On 2012-02-28 12:27 AM, Edward Lewis wrote:
At 13:35 -0500 2/27/12, Hector Santos wrote:
If it doesn't already exist or not considered in the past as an
unfeasible concept, I am interest in seeing if this is something
worth pursuing.
One (not the only, Ohta replied with another) of the
On 2012-02-27, at 19:49, Paul Vixie wrote:
On 2012-02-28 12:27 AM, Edward Lewis wrote:
At 13:35 -0500 2/27/12, Hector Santos wrote:
If it doesn't already exist or not considered in the past as an
unfeasible concept, I am interest in seeing if this is something
worth pursuing.
One (not
At 16:55 -0800 2/27/12, Joe Abley wrote:
I'll observe that there are exciting amplification opportunities in a
world where a single packet could trigger multiple large responses, though :-)
Yes, please, let's not. ;) Size amplification is already a problem.
And, this would make monitoring
On 27 Feb 2012, at 18:35, Hector Santos hsan...@isdg.net wrote:
I am interesting to find information about past or possible current interest
regarding the support of a Batch single call of multiple query packets.
It isn't necessary to add protocol support, since you can already send multiple
Paul Vixie wrote:
On 2012-02-28 12:27 AM, Edward Lewis wrote:
At 13:35 -0500 2/27/12, Hector Santos wrote:
If it doesn't already exist or not considered in the past as an
unfeasible concept, I am interest in seeing if this is something
worth pursuing.
One (not the only, Ohta replied with
Hello,
By single call, do you mean :
? single query packet (holding multiple questions) ?
(I think this was part of EDNS1)
? single TCP session ?
Where I believe there is no statement that forbids sending
multiple, subsequent, queries over a single TCP connection.
-- batching multiple
