On 26 Jul 2015, at 3:06, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
I wanted to follow up to the list to try again to make clear what I said in
the DNSOP meeting the other day.
In the first place, the point I was trying to make in the business model
remark is just this: some of the drafts trying to register
Hi,
I wanted to follow up to the list to try again to make clear what I
said in the DNSOP meeting the other day.
In the first place, the point I was trying to make in the business
model remark is just this: some of the drafts trying to register
special-use names that Christian Grothoff talked
John Heidemann wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 10:27:41 -0700, Paul Vixie wrote:
... With modern routers my understanding is it's usually bitrate not packet
count that is the limit. Bitrate is about the same for UDP vs. TCP. ...
... on the internet we have, packets per second are a common
On Jul 25, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com wrote:
But others of these proposals, such as bit., mark
out a name space and associated protocol that competes with the DNS.
It is a fully parallel name resolution universe, applicable to
absolutely any network application.
