Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: Kerberos service discovery

2016-05-31 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Mark Andrews wrote: Main arguments for using TXT instead of URI RR type are: ... We had been planning to use the URI record type, but after a recent round of discussion, we don't think it's likely that popular DNS hosting providers will allow customers to create URI records

Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: Kerberos service discovery

2016-05-31 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Petr Spacek write s: > Hello, > > I would like to draw attention of dnsop WG to discussion about new service > discovery method for Kerberos: > > Please see > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/current/msg06044.html > and

Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: Kerberos service discovery

2016-05-31 Thread Patrik Fältström
On 31 May 2016, at 21:13, John R Levine wrote: >> It is a big failure and problem for the Internet that there is no support >> for unknown resource record types. > > No kidding. The problem isn't with DNS server software like BIND and NSD, > which are updated regularly. Correct! > The problem

Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: Kerberos service discovery

2016-05-31 Thread Nicholas Weaver
> On May 31, 2016, at 12:13 PM, John R Levine wrote: > >> It is a big failure and problem for the Internet that there is no support >> for unknown resource record types. > > No kidding. The problem isn't with DNS server software like BIND and NSD, > which are updated

Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: Kerberos service discovery

2016-05-31 Thread John R Levine
It is a big failure and problem for the Internet that there is no support for unknown resource record types. No kidding. The problem isn't with DNS server software like BIND and NSD, which are updated regularly. The problem is the Web Crudware(tm) that most people use to manage their zones.

Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: Kerberos service discovery

2016-05-31 Thread Patrik Fältström
It is a big failure and problem for the Internet that there is no support for unknown resource record types. See RFC 3597 (from 2003) and followers. Patrik -- that because of this will continue to object to use of TXT, as we all have our windmills signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut

2016-05-31 Thread 神明達哉
At Thu, 26 May 2016 14:53:06 +0200, Tim Wicinski wrote: > There has been some good discussion from the working group on the list, > and with the recent discussion on root server tar pitting, it makes > sense to move this document along. > > This starts a Working Group Last

Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: Kerberos service discovery

2016-05-31 Thread John Levine
>Main arguments for using TXT instead of URI RR type are: >... >> We had been planning to use the URI record type, but after a recent >> round of discussion, we don't think it's likely that popular DNS hosting >> providers will allow customers to create URI records (since it seems >> like no one

[DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: Kerberos service discovery

2016-05-31 Thread Petr Spacek
Hello, I would like to draw attention of dnsop WG to discussion about new service discovery method for Kerberos: Please see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/current/msg06044.html and its continuation http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krbdev/2016-May/012588.html Main arguments for