On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Mark Andrews wrote:
Main arguments for using TXT instead of URI RR type are:
...
We had been planning to use the URI record type, but after a recent
round of discussion, we don't think it's likely that popular DNS hosting
providers will allow customers to create URI records
In message , Petr Spacek write
s:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to draw attention of dnsop WG to discussion about new service
> discovery method for Kerberos:
>
> Please see
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/current/msg06044.html
> and
On 31 May 2016, at 21:13, John R Levine wrote:
>> It is a big failure and problem for the Internet that there is no support
>> for unknown resource record types.
>
> No kidding. The problem isn't with DNS server software like BIND and NSD,
> which are updated regularly.
Correct!
> The problem
> On May 31, 2016, at 12:13 PM, John R Levine wrote:
>
>> It is a big failure and problem for the Internet that there is no support
>> for unknown resource record types.
>
> No kidding. The problem isn't with DNS server software like BIND and NSD,
> which are updated
It is a big failure and problem for the Internet that there is no support for
unknown resource record types.
No kidding. The problem isn't with DNS server software like BIND and NSD,
which are updated regularly. The problem is the Web Crudware(tm) that
most people use to manage their zones.
It is a big failure and problem for the Internet that there is no support for
unknown resource record types.
See RFC 3597 (from 2003) and followers.
Patrik -- that because of this will continue to object to use of TXT, as we
all have our windmills
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
At Thu, 26 May 2016 14:53:06 +0200,
Tim Wicinski wrote:
> There has been some good discussion from the working group on the list,
> and with the recent discussion on root server tar pitting, it makes
> sense to move this document along.
>
> This starts a Working Group Last
>Main arguments for using TXT instead of URI RR type are:
>...
>> We had been planning to use the URI record type, but after a recent
>> round of discussion, we don't think it's likely that popular DNS hosting
>> providers will allow customers to create URI records (since it seems
>> like no one
Hello,
I would like to draw attention of dnsop WG to discussion about new service
discovery method for Kerberos:
Please see
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/current/msg06044.html
and its continuation
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krbdev/2016-May/012588.html
Main arguments for