Re: [DNSOP] Draft Minutes from IETF100

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, tjw ietf wrote: Thanks again to Paul Hoffman for taking the minutes.  please take a look to see if there are any updates that need to be made and let the chairs know.  https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/minutes-100-dnsop/ Thanks PaulH! I couldn't make it

[DNSOP] Draft Minutes from IETF100

Thanks again to Paul Hoffman for taking the minutes. please take a look to see if there are any updates that need to be made and let the chairs know. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/minutes-100-dnsop/ You can also just submit a pull request:

Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS.

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Nov 15, 2017, at 10:51 PM, Mike West wrote: > > Skimming through the recording of Monday's meeting > > (starting > at around

Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS.

On Nov 15, 2017, at 10:51 PM, Mike West wrote: > Skimming through the recording of Monday's meeting > > (starting at around 53:56), it sounds to me as though there's at least loose > agreement that

Re: [DNSOP] CDS polling, was Re: [Ext] Re: Clarifying referrals (#35)

Paul Wouters wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Jacques Latour wrote: > > > Personally, I like a mix of #3 and #1, on a regular basis poll the entire > > zone for changes, and have a mechanism to listen to child notifications > > for urgent changes. > > Agreed. Yes. > > _AND_

[DNSOP] Comments on mic comments, 5011 update's authorship

...From listening to the recording of the meeting on Monday, Nov 13,2017: It seems that there is an impression that I feel the authors of the 5011-update draft are wrong choice to be documenting this. This is not meant to be a personal attack on the authors but a blanket comment on seeing

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: Configured Trust Anchor vs. DS record

To begin...thanks, Frederico, I was trying to find that case but had forgotten which ccTLD was involved. (Web searches failed me...) On 11/14/17, 23:11, "DNSOP on behalf of Paul Wouters" wrote: >On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Frederico A C Neves

Re: [DNSOP] Clarifying referrals (#35)

Paul Vixie wrote: > > the reason i use SERVFAIL for NOTAUTH is because what i want the initiator to > do when i'm configured as primary but can't read my zone file, or am > configured as secondary but can't write my zone file, is the same as what i > want when i'm not configured