[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-07.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : Providing Minimal-Sized Responses to DNS Queries that have QTYPE=ANY Authors : Joe Abley

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-12

Thanks for the review! On Aug 13, 2018, at 8:18 PM, Allison Mankin wrote: > > Reviewer: Allison Mankin > Review result: Almost Ready > > Overall Comment - there is a lot of illumination in here, but one overall > point > and a few smaller ones explain why I rated the draft Almost Ready,

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: Last Call: (DNS Terminology) to Best Current Practice

Here we go with a thread on the set of Domain Names being a superset of host names again. ;) On 8/14/18, 09:09, "DNSOP on behalf of Tony Finch" wrote: Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > Indeed in a non-public network, I'm free to provision a > ".1" TLD, and even create hosts as

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: Comments on draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest-02

My reason for replying to this thead is to say that “we have other solutions in place for this, why one more?” On 8/13/18, 16:43, "DNSOP on behalf of Brian Dickson" mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> wro >While it

Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: (DNS Terminology) to Best Current Practice

Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > Indeed in a non-public network, I'm free to provision a > ".1" TLD, and even create hosts as sub-domains of this name: This would break a (non-normative) promise in RFC 1123 However, a valid host name can never have the