[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-05.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : DNS Catalog Zones Authors : Peter van Dijk Libor Peltan

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-02.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : Delegation Revalidation by DNS Resolvers Authors : Shumon Huque Paul

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-sahib-domain-verification-techniques-03.txt

This draft needs a lot of work but I think it could be worth adopting. R's, John It appears that Shivan Kaul Sahib said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Hi all, we just published a new version of the DNS domain verification >techniques draft. We've made some changes

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-sahib-domain-verification-techniques-03.txt

Hi all, we just published a new version of the DNS domain verification techniques draft. We've made some changes and have a new author (thanks Paul Wouters!) As mentioned last time, we're looking for DNSOP WG

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-02.txt

Vladimír Čunát writes: > On 26/02/2022 00.30, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > Validating resolvers MAY choose to not respond to NSEC3 records with > > iterations larger than 0. > > The -05 version sounds clearer here than -04 ("not respond" above) or > -03.  Thanks. You should check -06 too -- I

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-06.txt

Petr Špaček writes: > On 07. 03. 22 17:51, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > Filename: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-06.txt > > I have no nits to report. > > Such thing have not happened to me for a long time - well done! :-) :-) :-) -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-06.txt

On 07. 03. 22 17:51, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: Filename: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-06.txt I have no nits to report. Such thing have not happened to me for a long time - well done! -- Petr Špaček ___ DNSOP mailing list

[DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-06.txt published

I just published draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-06.txt which has much better text in 3.2 (Recommendation for Validating Resolvers). -06 resolves all outstanding issues that I'm aware of at the moment. (please don't read -05 -- it was broken [thanks Viktor]). -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-06.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : Guidance for NSEC3 parameter settings Authors : Wes Hardaker Viktor

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-05.txt

Peter van Dijk writes: > > Because hashing provides only moderate protection, as shown recently > in academic studies of NSEC3 protected zones [GPUNSEC3][ZONEENUM]. > > This sentence appears to be lacking a second half. Changed to: Recent in academic studies have shown that NSEC3 hashing

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-02.txt

On 26/02/2022 00.30, Wes Hardaker wrote: Validating resolvers MAY choose to not respond to NSEC3 records with iterations larger than 0. The -05 version sounds clearer here than -04 ("not respond" above) or -03.  Thanks. --Vladimir ___ DNSOP

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-05.txt

Wes, Viktor, On Sun, 2022-03-06 at 20:36 -0800, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > Filename: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-05.txt Thank you for your continued work on this. This appears to be in excellent shape - you'd have my support in a WGLC. I love that we managed to get to