Mark Andrews wrote on 2022-11-11 02:26:
...
4. Caching DNS Servers: Caching servers MUST [or SHOULD] NOT
attempt to resolve .alt names in the global DNS root. They
MAY respond to queries for such names with NXDOMAIN [or
REFUSED?].
Caching servers MUST
Hello.
It's not a major thing in your design, but I see a risk that DNSKEYs at
non-apex might have trouble validating, so at some point I'd expect your
proposal to choose a different approach (e.g. allocate a new identical
RR type) or at least confirm that it won't be a major problem.
On Nov 11, 2022, at 9:48 AM, Wessels, Duane
wrote:
>
> I find the latest alt-tld draft to be inconsistent when it first
> says “[alt names] should not be looked up in a DNS context” and
> "DNS stub and recursive resolvers do not need to look them up in
> the DNS context” but then later "Caching
All
Thanks everyone for attending (and apologies for my bad audio from multiple
devices it seems). Thanks also to Paul Hofman for taking minutes.
I merged my notes and added some Chairs Actions (still being discussed),
and uploaded them:
Dne 11. 11. 22 v 10:48 Wessels, Duane napsal(a):
5. Authoritative DNS Servers: Authoritative servers MUST respond to
queries for .alt names with NXDOMAIN.
I don't like to repeat myself, but I still consider this requirement
proposal inproper and I disagree with it.
The
> On 11 Nov 2022, at 09:48, Wessels, Duane
> wrote:
>
> I find the latest alt-tld draft to be inconsistent when it first
> says “[alt names] should not be looked up in a DNS context” and
> "DNS stub and recursive resolvers do not need to look them up in
> the DNS context” but then later
I find the latest alt-tld draft to be inconsistent when it first
says “[alt names] should not be looked up in a DNS context” and
"DNS stub and recursive resolvers do not need to look them up in
the DNS context” but then later "Caching DNS servers will treat
[alt names] just as they would any other
