The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
(dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Fragmentation Avoidance in DNS'
as Best Current Practice
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send
Hi there, authors (and WG),
Thank you for this document, I found it clear, useful, and an easy read.
I did have one comment / clarification which I think would help the
document.
I don't think that it is especially clear to the first time reader that the
query itself is the error report. Yes,
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 4:05 AM, tirumal reddy wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 21:37, Tommy Pauly org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 11, 2023, at 3:17 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 12:56 PM, Vodafone Gianpaolo Angelo Scalone <
>>
Dear Tim Wicinski,
The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.
Below is the scheduled session information followed by
the original request.
dnsop Session 1 (1:00 requested)
Tuesday, 7 November 2023, Session IV 1700-1800 Europe/Prague
Room Name: Congress Hall 3 size:
I was looking at these two drafts. The first one says that scanning
for CDS updates is bad, so use NOTIFY(CDS) rather than scanning. The
second one says to scan for DS bootstrap. I am experiencing cognitive
dissonance.
I suggest adjusting the bootstrap draft saying to send NOTIFY(DS) to
the
On 13 Oct 2023, at 17:22, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>> The draft is available here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bash-rfc7958bis/
>> Here is the diff from RFC7958 itself:
>>
On Oct 13, 2023, at 08:21, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>> The draft is available here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bash-rfc7958bis/
>> Here is the diff from RFC7958 itself:
>>
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, Tim Wicinski wrote:
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bash-rfc7958bis/
Here is the diff from RFC7958 itself:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=rfc7958=draft-bash-rfc7958bis-01=--html
Please review this draft to see if you think
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dnsop-qdcount-is-one-00.txt is now available. It is
a work item of the Domain Name System Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF.
Title: In the DNS, QDCOUNT is (usually) One
Authors: Ray Bellis
Joe Abley
Name:draft-ietf-dnsop-qdcount-is-one-00.txt
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 21:37, Tommy Pauly
wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 11, 2023, at 3:17 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 12:56 PM, Vodafone Gianpaolo Angelo Scalone <
> Gianpaolo-Angelo.Scalone=40vodafone@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> I really love this draft and would
Moin!
On 12 Oct 2023, at 18:54, Eric Orth wrote:
> Advertisements would be annoying, but my biggest concern with this stuff
> has always been links to pages that mimic the page the user was trying to
> access in the first place. If the user types in social-network.com, I
> don't trust users to
11 matches
Mail list logo
