Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00

2009-07-14 Thread Alan Barrett
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009, Livingood, Jason wrote:
 I submitted this draft, which you can find at
 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00, before
 the =??00 cutoff on Monday, and it will be discussed in the DNSOP WG
 meeting at IETF 75 (it is listed on the agenda).

I think that this sort of lying recursive resolver is a bad idea.
Instead, I suggest a new SUGGESTION RR type that could be returned
in the additional section of an error message.  For example, if
you ask for www.example.invalid, you could get back an NXDOMAIN
error, with SUGGESTION URL=http://10.2.3.4/www.example.invalid;
in the additional section, and if you ask for censored.example.
you could get back a SERVFAIL response with SUGGESTION
URL=http://10.2.3.4/why-we-censor.html; in the additional section.

Clients who want to follow such suggestions can then do so, without
harming clients who don't want to be lied to.

--apb (Alan Barrett)
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop


Re: [DNSOP] Adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming as WG work item?

2007-06-14 Thread Alan Barrett
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Dean Anderson wrote:
 There has been no technical discussion of Moreau's proposal. There had
 been no technical discussion on May 10th, when Austein offficially
 directed the authors to disregard the proposal. 

I see only one message from Rob Austein dated 10 May 2007.  In that
message he did not direct any authors to do anything.  He made a
prediction about his own future behaviour if there was not strong
support from disinterested WG participants.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop


Re: [DNSOP] Adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming as WG work item?

2007-06-12 Thread Alan Barrett
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Dean Anderson wrote:
 There is an appearance of impropriety because Austein is on both sides
 of the transaction: For ISC and also for IETF DNSOP WG.

What transaction are you referring to?  Please be specific.  I was
not aware of any exchange of services, money, patents, trademarks, or
anything else, between ISC and the DNSOP working group.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop