Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] re original_transport indicator

sean gallagher did an excellent writeup on all this in arstechnica today: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2018/04/how-to-keep-your-isps-nose-out-of-your-browser-history-with-encrypted-dns/ he didn't mention the bii/tisf proxy method from three years ago, but since our draft has

Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] re original_transport indicator

On 7 April 2018 at 07:29, Paul Vixie wrote: > > > i am generally supportive of this approach; in fact i wish i'd thought of > it. the specifics will be different, as in: > > /proxy_dns?proto=tcp > /proxy_dns?proto=udp > > but i agree that encoding the original transport in the

Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] re original_transport indicator

Good idea - future-proofing is great in theory, but it sounds like there's a lot of non-consensus on the DNSOP side that we might end up adding something that is superseded anyway. Rory From: Patrick McManus [mailto:pmcma...@mozilla.com] Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 1:54 PM To: Martin