Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

2022-04-11 Thread Jim Reid
> On 11 Apr 2022, at 14:01, Masataka Ohta > wrote: > > I can't see any as discussion is still ongoing. There is no discussion, just you arguing with yourself. Please stop. ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

2022-04-11 Thread Jerry Lundström
I'm against the proposals from Ohta-san. /Jerry On 4/11/22 15:01, Masataka Ohta wrote: Paul Hoffman wrote: I see a very strong consensus in this thread against the proposals from Ohta-san, I can't see any as discussion is still ongoing.     Masataka Ohta

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

2022-04-11 Thread Masataka Ohta
Paul Hoffman wrote: I see a very strong consensus in this thread against the proposals from Ohta-san, I can't see any as discussion is still ongoing. Masataka Ohta ___ DNSOP mailing list

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

2022-04-08 Thread Paul Hoffman
Now that the document in question has been published as a WG document, it follows the standard IETF rules about consensus. As document author, I will follow those rules to the best of my ability. I see a very strong consensus in this thread against the proposals from Ohta-san, so I think the

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

2022-03-23 Thread Masataka Ohta
Paul Hoffman wrote: My reading of this thread is that one person thinks that there is a better way to achieve what DNSSEC is designed to achieve, and no one else agrees with him. Thus, I'll leave the text in the document alone unless I see more support for that lone opinion. I'm afraid you

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

2022-03-22 Thread Paul Hoffman
My reading of this thread is that one person thinks that there is a better way to achieve what DNSSEC is designed to achieve, and no one else agrees with him. Thus, I'll leave the text in the document alone unless I see more support for that lone opinion. --Paul Hoffman smime.p7s Description: