Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" writes: > I have no objection to adding that that, but I was thinking along the > lines of "Note that continuing without DNSSEC protection in the > absence of a notification or report could lead to situations where > users assume a level of security does not

Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

On 5 Aug 2016, at 16:05, Wes Hardaker wrote: "Ben Campbell" writes: [everything else addressed but I had a question about this last one:] -8: Seems like there could be more to say about the potential consequences about the “fail or proceed without security” decision in

Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" writes: [everything else addressed but I had a question about this last one:] >>> -8: Seems like there could be more to say about the potential >>> consequences about the “fail or proceed without security” decision >>> in 6 >>> and 6.1. >> >> I think the world

Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

Thanks for the response. Discussion inline, with things that appear to be addressed removed. Ben. On 8 Jul 2016, at 16:26, Wes Hardaker wrote: "Ben Campbell" writes: [...] - 1.2, 2nd paragraph: Is "full non-support" effectively different from "non-support" in this

Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" writes: > - I support Terry's discuss. Fixed (see response to Terry) > - 1.2, 2nd paragraph: Is "full non-support" effectively different from > "non-support" in this context? CHanged to "Detecting complete lack of support", which I hope works for you? > Do we

[DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)