i think we can't use something in a standard that doesn't have a
canonical format. if there is a F(name) that produces a minimal I18N
result which is the same as any other F(name) that would look the same
or mean the same if written, then we should outlaw on-the-wire strings
that are not in that
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 02:41:20PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> What I should have said is that the variant with the upper case
> first letter is invalid (as opposed to being "different") in
> IDNA2008. This is IMHO a poor user interface, so running code
> will generally go with UTS#46
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 7:30 AM, dnsop-requ...@ietf.org wrote:
>
> Well, IIRC they sensibly converged on a case-folded normal form
> that ensures that https://Духовный.org maps to the same underlying
> wire-form domain as https://духовный.org, i.e. both result in
> queries for
