On 8/10/16, 20:55, "Paul Hoffman" wrote:
>That seems like a categorization, not a definition. Or are there
>definitions that involve "local policy" you or Ed can propose?
I've given this some thought and am a bit conflicted.
On the one hand, the intent of DNSSEC way-back-when was that
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings again. There are six terms that are commonly used when we talk
> about DNSSEC:
> - validation and validate
> - authentication and authenticate
> - verification and verify
> Are they defined in any RFCs that we can use for the term
Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > RFC 4949 - Internet Security Glossary
>
> I looked there, but the terms don't fit well for DNSSEC. If there are bits
> below that we can pick out, great, but it seems like a stretch.
Hmm, yes, much less useful than my vague memory suggested. And I'm not
sure some of its r
On 9 Aug 2016, at 14:56, william manning wrote:
must be mass hallucination. My memory concurs with Ed on the
history.
If you MUST define authentication, validation, and verification, I
would
place them under, "local policy"
That seems like a categorization, not a definition. Or are there
On 9 Aug 2016, at 4:05, Tony Finch wrote:
Greetings again. There are six terms that are commonly used when
we talk
about DNSSEC:
- validation and validate
- authentication and authenticate
- verification and verify
Are they defined in any RFCs that we can use for
must be mass hallucination. My memory concurs with Ed on the history.
If you MUST define authentication, validation, and verification, I would
place them under, "local policy"
/W
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Edward Lewis wrote:
> On 8/4/16, 10:16, "DNSOP on behalf of Paul Hoffman" <
> dnso
> Greetings again. There are six terms that are commonly used when we talk
> about DNSSEC:
> - validation and validate
> - authentication and authenticate
> - verification and verify
> Are they defined in any RFCs that we can use for the terminology-bis
> document?
On 8/4/16, 10:16, "DNSOP on behalf of Paul Hoffman" wrote:
Greetings again. There are six terms that are commonly used when we talk
about DNSSEC:
- validation and validate
- authentication and authenticate
- verification and verify
Are they defined in any RFCs that
On 4 Aug 2016, at 15:34, Wes Hardaker wrote:
"Paul Hoffman" writes:
Greetings again. There are six terms that are commonly used when we
talk about DNSSEC:
- validation and validate
- authentication and authenticate
- verification and verify
Are they defined in any RFCs that we can use for
"Paul Hoffman" writes:
> Greetings again. There are six terms that are commonly used when we
> talk about DNSSEC:
> - validation and validate
> - authentication and authenticate
> - verification and verify
> Are they defined in any RFCs that we can use for the terminology-bis
> document? As fa
Greetings again. There are six terms that are commonly used when we talk
about DNSSEC:
- validation and validate
- authentication and authenticate
- verification and verify
Are they defined in any RFCs that we can use for the terminology-bis
document? As far as I can see (but I could be blind
11 matches
Mail list logo