> On Apr 25, 2022, at 8:56 AM, Hugo Salgado wrote:
>
> Thank you very much Duane for the changes. For my part, the paragraph
> on the requirements on data in zones and registries seems perfect.
>
> I also find the new way of mentioning glues for in-domain/sibling
> domain name servers
Thank you very much Duane for the changes. For my part, the paragraph
on the requirements on data in zones and registries seems perfect.
I also find the new way of mentioning glues for in-domain/sibling
domain name servers clearer. However I see that the change was made
only in chapters 2 and 3,
There are three noteworthy changes from the previous version of this draft:
1. We no longer use the term “referral glue”.
2. Instead of introducing new (and likely confusing) terms such as “sibling
glue” and “in-domain glue” we now refer to these as “glue for sibling domain
name servers” and
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : DNS Glue Requirements in Referral Responses
Authors : M. Andrews
