Re: [DNSOP] IESG COMMENT/DISCUSSION responses to the dnsop-child-sync draft

2014-12-18 Thread Ted Lemon
On Dec 18, 2014, at 2:31 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote: > Does this (end-of-a) paragraph solve your problem? Yup, thanks. ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] IESG COMMENT/DISCUSSION responses to the dnsop-child-sync draft

2014-12-18 Thread Wes Hardaker
Ted Lemon writes: > (I realize that I took a while responding as well; this isn't intended > to imply a criticism, but I figured I should let you know.) Not a problem. It's not like I can talk! >> *** NOFIX Point 3-- >> >>I don't think you've specifically excluded RRtypes not mentioned in

Re: [DNSOP] IESG COMMENT/DISCUSSION responses to the dnsop-child-sync draft

2014-12-16 Thread Ted Lemon
Comments below. Executive summary: everything's fine except I'm still not convinced nothing needs to be done about point 3 of my DISCUSS. I will be incommunicado between Christmas and 1/5, and to some extent possibly sooner, so a quick response is essential if you are hoping to have this DIS

[DNSOP] IESG COMMENT/DISCUSSION responses to the dnsop-child-sync draft

2014-11-26 Thread Wes Hardaker
After *way* too long of a delay (entirely my fault), here are some responses to the IESG about the comments and discusses on the document. It's close to finalized I hope, and I did publish a -04 to reflect the changes made below. Below is a list of the IESG member's and their comments, as well as